Proceeding contribution from Baroness Henig (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 June 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
As regards my amendment, I remain puzzled that the Government have not seen fit to move in this area. When this matter was discussed in Committee, a large number of reasons were put forward by Members on all sides of the House as to why it was a bad idea for an acting commissioner to be an unelected member of staff. I do not think that we heard any convincing reason—I cannot remember one anyway—as to why a member of staff should be asked to act up in this way for what could be a period of months. This is an obvious area where a concession could have been made with little difficulty but I am surprised that it has not been. I reserve the right to come back to my amendment at the relevant point. Amendment 5 agreed. Amendment 6 agreed. Amendment 7 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 728 c1814
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children Accountability Administration Finance Dismissal Pilot schemes Protection Police Public appointments Police authorities Political impartiality Reform Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:04:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755023
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755023
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755023