Proceeding contribution from Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 June 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Convention on Domestic Workers.
Convention on Domestic Workers
I congratulate the hon. Member for Slough South East (Fiona Mactaggart) on securing a debate on this important subject. She spent quite a lot of time talking about trafficking, and I understand her campaigning role on that and her record, but we do want to talk about the text of the convention, so I thank her for the opportunity to explain why the Government abstained on the vote on the convention while strongly supporting its principles. A key factor in understanding our position is recognition of how the convention would or would not have changed our domestic laws for domestic workers. In the UK, we already have a legal framework of basic employment rights and social protections for employees and workers, including domestic workers. So, like other workers, most domestic workers benefit from the national minimum wage, statutory sick pay, paid annual leave and protection from discrimination and unfair dismissal, as well as other protections. My hon. Friend the Member for South West Bedfordshire (Andrew Selous) was completely right about that: the key question is enforcement.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c287-8WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Employment Human rights International cooperation Domestic service Standards Treaties Visas International Labour Organization
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:00:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755135
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755135
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755135