Proceeding contribution from Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 June 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Convention on Domestic Workers.
Convention on Domestic Workers
Of course, those would be covered if we went down this route. What would be the benefit of extending health and safety laws to individuals and increasing the scope of our criminal regime? Why would we want to give health and safety inspectors a new right to visit millions of homes? Why would we want to pass quite an intrusive law, which the previous Government baulked at? The evidence of the need for such a change is weak, to say the least. Despite what the hon. Member for Llanelli said, households are low risk in health and safety terms. If there is any increased vulnerability for domestic workers, it arises not from health and safety concerns, but from issues such as their treatment by their employers, which is already covered in other legislation. Of course, we could have voted for the convention and then not ratified it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c291-2WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Employment Human rights International cooperation Domestic service Standards Treaties Visas International Labour Organization
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:00:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755153
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755153
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755153