Proceeding contribution from Earl Cathcart (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 June 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
My Lords, I cannot quite understand where we are, which is why I got up before. Earlier this week I moved Amendments 125 and 126, which provided that a councillor could not call for a referendum unless he had a petition signed by 5 per cent of the electorate. I have before me the Hansard report where the Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, said: "““I believe that the safeguard we have in place—that, following a request from a member, a referendum may not be held unless the full council has resolved that it be held””.—[Official Report, 28/6/11; col. 1746.]" Surely that is the check. I admit that it is far better than the one we proposed, which was getting 5 per cent of the vote.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 728 c1910-1
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Community development Costs Council tax Increases Local government Planning Public consultation Publicity Referendums Parish and town councils Petitions
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-22 18:44:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755569
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755569
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755569