Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 July 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (Commencement No. 3) Order 2011.


Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (Commencement No. 3) Order 2011

I certainly cannot answer that directly; I will have to write. It is an interesting point. I shall not mention providers by name, but if a private prison or a private transporter of prisoners was guilty of corporate manslaughter, would the line of responsibility run back to the MoJ? I take it that that is the point. It is an interesting point. I suspect that, on the one hand, the suggestion would be that the responsibility for the corporate manslaughter would be that of the provider and that the provider would be charged; on the other hand, there is the argument that the MoJ should never have given the contract to such a body in the first place. This is what makes this job both interesting and frightening at times. I shall write to my noble friend to clarify. Motion agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c83-4GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Armed forces Death Custodial treatment Corporate manslaughter Immigration Liability Health and safety Government departments Private sector Northern Ireland Ministry of Defence UK Border Agency
Legislation
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (Amendment) Order 2011
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (Commencement No. 3) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk