Proceeding contribution from Nick Raynsford (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 11 July 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Open Public Services White Paper.
Open Public Services White Paper
The right hon. Gentleman made a lot in his speech of the potential for local community groups to take over assets of community value and seize control of planning in their areas. He will be aware that there are community groups in various areas of the country—I would remind him of the route of High Speed 2—that are not necessarily in favour of development and may wish to use enhanced powers to stop it. He will also be conscious that the Chancellor said in his Budget speech that in such instances of national economic development interest, the default planning position should be to say yes. Who will prevail in a conflict between a community wanting to stop a development and the Chancellor wanting it to proceed?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 531 c32
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Disadvantaged Community development Administration Competition Finance Local government Private sector Public sector Ombudsman Mutual societies Civil society
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:09:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758665
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758665
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758665