Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
I shall ponder on that. My other question, which my noble friend Lord Shipley may have asked on a previous occasion, is whether, given the importance of the numbers, the Government anticipate providing through regulations procedures for substitutes for members of the panel. Furthermore, is it intentional on the part of those who proposed these amendments that they apply only to the precept and not to the appointments, which is the other candidate for veto? Whatever we end up with should stay the same. I think it is right that a member can affect an outcome by staying away, and I hope that my noble friend the Minister can reassure the House on that point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c479
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Conditions of employment Devolved matters Accountability Audit Council tax Finance Elections Eligibility Greater London Misconduct Police Membership Public appointments Members Political parties Mayor of London Political impartiality Metropolitan Police Security Reform Wales Mayors Olympic Games 2012 Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:51:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759194
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759194
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759194