Proceeding contribution from Lord Beecham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
In the noble Baroness’s Amendment 128, does not new subsection (2B)(b) impose a condition that ““no such resolution”” to have a number of co-opted members may be passed unless, "““the Secretary of State agrees that the panel should have that number of co-opted members””." What is that if not micromanagement?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c494
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Conditions of employment Devolved matters Accountability Audit Council tax Finance Elections Eligibility Greater London Misconduct Police Membership Public appointments Members Political parties Mayor of London Political impartiality Metropolitan Police Security Reform Wales Mayors Olympic Games 2012 Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:44:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759220
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759220
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759220