Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Browning (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.


Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill

126: Schedule 6, page 123, line 24, leave out ““two”” and insert ““the appropriate number of”” 127: Schedule 6, page 123, line 25, leave out ““(1)”” and insert ““(1)(a)”” 128: Schedule 6, page 123, line 29, at end insert— ““(2A) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1)(b), the ““appropriate number”” is— (a) two, or (b) if a resolution of the panel under sub-paragraph (2B) is in force, the number of co-opted members specified in that resolution. (2B) A police and crime panel may resolve that the panel is to have the number of co-opted members specified in the resolution; but no such resolution may be passed unless— (a) that number of co-opted members is greater than two; (b) the Secretary of State agrees that the panel should have that number of co-opted members; and (c) the total membership of the panel, including that number of co-opted members, would not exceed 20.”” Amendments 126 to 128 agreed. Amendment 129 not moved. Amendments 130 to 132 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c573 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Conditions of employment Devolved matters Accountability Audit Council tax Finance Elections Eligibility Greater London Misconduct Police Membership Public appointments Members Political parties Mayor of London Political impartiality Metropolitan Police Security Reform Wales Mayors Olympic Games 2012 Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
Legislation
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk