Proceeding contribution from Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union Bill.
European Union Bill
My Lords, I said on Third Reading that the proposal for a sunset clause was ill conceived. I believed that to be true then, and I believe it to be true now. While I was not present for the debate in the other place, I did read it today and unfortunately a lot of unkind things were said about this House, which is unusual. A consistent theme throughout the discussion on the amendments was that a number of them were wrecking amendments. That is how this amendment was seen by a number of Members in the other place. The noble Lord, Lord Hannay, said that only a small number were there, and that was undoubtedly true, but to some extent that makes the point, because if Members in the other place were actively supportive of the decisions of your Lordships’ House some weeks ago, why did they vote with their feet and not turn up to debate some of these amendments? They obviously did not see merit in them. That is the only reason I can think of why they would abstain in such a way.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c781
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- EU law European communities Referendums Sovereignty Treaties UK membership of EU Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- European Communities Act 1972
- European Union Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:15:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_760722
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_760722
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_760722