Proceeding contribution from John Whittingdale (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 20 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on Public Confidence in the Media and Police.
Public Confidence in the Media and Police
I know that it was widely believed that Sean Hoare's testimony would not stand up in court. I want to raise one other matter that relates to the actions that could have been taken by the previous Government. The one recommendation from the Information Commissioner, right back at the time of the ““What price privacy?”” report, was that the maximum penalty for breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 should be a custodial sentence. Press freedom is protected because there is a public interest defence in that Act. My understanding is that the right hon. Member for Blackburn (Mr Straw), who was the Home Secretary at the time, accepted that recommendation and it was Government policy to impose a custodial sentence as a maximum sentence, but he was then overruled by the then Prime Minister following pressure from the media.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 531 c982
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Accountability Criminal investigation Corruption Competition Sky Police Newspaper press Media Metropolitan Police Regulation Resignations Telephone tapping Politicians News International News Corporation Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press Inquiry Coulson, Andy
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:02:17 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764112
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764112
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764112