Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Clappison (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 20 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on Public Confidence in the Media and Police.


Public Confidence in the Media and Police

My hon. Friend is right, and that is why I have been very careful to refer to investigations that should take place, and which we now believe are taking place. We should not do anything that will either interfere with the proper course of those investigations or prejudice a fair trial for anybody who is brought to trial as a result of them. However, the question of a free and robust press is separate from that. An under-reaction would not be in the public interest, but neither would an overreaction, would could even be more damaging. We need a diverse, free and robust press that is unmuzzled. Too great a concentration of broadcasting, which is so important, in one set of hands can be against the public interest. I heard what my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister in his statement, and I agree completely with him. He made some very valuable contributions, particularly when he referred to the position of the BBC, which is a sensitive matter. I feel—I suppose I would, as a Conservative—that there has at times been a certain amount of bias, or a predisposition, in the editorial line of the BBC, and that certain matters that should have been investigated or highlighted have not been given proper attention. It is to the credit of the BBC that its present director-general has said that, looking back, the BBC did not do full justice to the issue of immigration.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
531 c998-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Accountability Criminal investigation Corruption Competition Sky Police Newspaper press Media Metropolitan Police Regulation Resignations Telephone tapping Politicians News International News Corporation Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press Inquiry Coulson, Andy
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk