Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill.
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill
As the hon. Gentleman will be aware, one Parliament cannot bind another. It would not be appropriate for me to suggest or require that a future Government act in a particular way when addressing such points. It would be reasonable and appropriate, however, to consider these matters carefully and in a measured and appropriate way, examining the security issues at that point in time in the same way as this Government sought to do in our counter-terrorism review, which led to the creation of this Bill. We consider that a five-year renewal period, allowing each Parliament the opportunity to take a view on this important issue, strikes the right balance.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 532 c54-5
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Anti-terrorism control orders Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:12:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_766048
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_766048
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_766048