Proceeding contribution from Lord Coaker (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police reform and social responsibility Bill
I am glad that the hon. Gentleman admits it. I have never known anyone vote against their own amendments, but there we go. The hon. Member for Cannock Chase (Mr Burley) will know that the Liberal Democrats did not propose that one individual should be directly elected to hold the police to account. Their manifesto proposal was for directly elected police authorities, with a multiplicity of people holding the police to account. He will also be aware that the Green Paper that the last Government introduced in 2008 proposed a model not totally dissimilar from what the Liberal Democrats proposed at the last election. It is also interesting to witness the difference in approach between those who go out to consultation and listen to what people say, and those who go out to consultation and say, ““We don't care what you said. We're going to do this anyway.””
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 532 c792
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Devon Cornwall Elections Police Powers Metropolitan Police Wales London Assembly Police and crime commissioners
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:34:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768299
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768299
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768299