Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 (Consequential Modifications of Enactments) Order 2011.


Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 (Consequential Modifications of Enactments) Order 2011

My Lords, this order appears to be uncontroversial and is before this Committee only because it is required to have an affirmative resolution. The only question I wish to ask is whether in the case of orders of this kind, which are not designed to amend the legislation, save—as my noble friend, the Minister, has said—to reflect, in a technical sense, the consequences of legislation by the Scottish Parliament, it might make sense, for reasons of expedition, to amend the Scotland Act to enable the measures to be incorporated in negative resolutions rather than affirmative resolutions. The Minister clearly explained that there is no issue of policy at stake here other than the maintenance of the status quo. As the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments has not raised any matter about drafting or anything else, there is every reason to believe that this is an acceptable instrument. We now frequently see consequential legislation brought forward for extensive debates and this does not seem to be strictly necessary, bearing in mind the pressures on the United Kingdom Parliament.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c32GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Public sector Scotland Reform
Legislation
Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 (Consequential Modifications of Enactments) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk