Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
The noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, makes an important point. It is interesting how there is some support for people in this position where they are deliberately made to share. There is a supportive nature to getting a group. I am conscious that there are some wonderful operations that work on that principle, which is why it is so difficult. However, if there were a letter from a psychiatrist that said, ““We will not release this person unless it is into self-contained accommodation””, that would seem to give the responsible housing authority a fairly clear steer towards what he should be spending his discretionary housing payment upon. I do not think we need to overelaborate on that. The noble Baroness’s question brings into focus the problem with blanket exemptions: they are not appropriate, even for the particular group that we feel very supportive of—people with mental conditions or recovering from them. In view of this remise of last week’s debate, I hope that what I have said allows the noble Baroness to withdraw her amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 731 c134-5GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Carers Costs Housing benefit Housing Multiple occupation Private rented housing Standards Rents Universal credit
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:05:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775699
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775699
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775699