Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
The noble Earl raises the complex issue, which we have been looking at very closely, of whether exemptions are appropriate in this area, and we have reluctantly come to the view that they simply are not appropriate. It is just so complicated to define and difficult to police. As we all know, the costs of family breakdown are extraordinarily high, and it is difficult to organise a state system to manage that in the fullest possible way. When we looked at this, the numbers of non-resident parents who kept in touch with their children were, regrettably, relatively small. On the question of whether that keeping in touch was overnight and whether that was an essential, the numbers shrank even more. So we were looking at a very small issue in terms of numbers and an incredibly high cost due to the way that it would then be used if we had a blanket exemption.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 731 c135GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Carers Costs Housing benefit Housing Multiple occupation Private rented housing Standards Rents Universal credit
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:03:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775701
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775701
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775701