Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
My Lords, I did not address absolutely smack on that particular point from the noble Lord. The review that we have is of the impact of our LHA, shared accommodation and other changes. It is not a kind of total, all-encompassing review. I did not mean to oversell it in its breadth; I was selling it in its depth in terms of an econometric analysis of what happens in the market when you make changes. That is what I was selling as the best piece of work since Boadicea, whose impact on housing in London was even more negative than some noble Lords claim ours is. There is not a read across from that review to what we shall be doing in universal credit.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 731 c159GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Carers Costs Housing benefit Housing Multiple occupation Private rented housing Standards Rents Universal credit
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:02:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775746
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775746
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775746