Proceeding contribution from Lord Hylton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education Bill.
Education Bill
My Lords, after four speeches in favour of Amendment 80, the amendment still appears both overprescriptive and unnecessary. I say ““unnecessary”” in the light of the proposed new subsection (5B)(a) to the 2005 Act, which appears at the top of page 37 of the Bill. It lists, "““spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils””." As if that were not enough, proposed new subsection (5B)(b) talks about, "““the needs of the range of pupils””," in the school. In addition, the chief inspector and all the other Ofsted inspectors will have to take account of the guidance already issued by the Secretary of State in July 2000. Finally, if this amendment were to be accepted, it would seem to fly completely in the face of the policy of localism quite rightly adopted by this Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 731 c819
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Bullying Children Admissions Closures Education Inspections Exemptions Faith schools Local government Pre-school education Personal, social, health and economic education Standards Religion Safety Voluntary schools Academies Office of the Schools Adjudicator Free schools Ofsted Relationships and sex education Maintained schools
- Legislation
- Education Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:51:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778402
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778402
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778402