Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 7 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

We are getting into a technical exchange—[Interruption.] It is very technical, and I think that the right hon. Gentleman has answered his own question, as Government Members have pointed out from a sedentary position. The previous Government's proposals for the non-binding aspect of the referendum were clearly inadequate, but I concede that, as the Minister said at the time, they represent a start. It was a start until the entire chapter was dropped as it was being negotiated in the other place. That might have been a mistake, in which case I am happy to reintroduce the concept in the amendment, but it takes the previous Government's idea one step further. The amendment would give people power to instigate a local referendum, which is a commitment that all Government Members made in the run-up to the last election. We all committed to ensuring that people could have their say in local referendums, and in my view it was an important part of the manifesto. Crucially, it is binding. Crucially, we have raised the threshold to 20%, which I hope would prevent the kind of abuses that people are worried about.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
535 c96 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Council tax Elections EU law Fire and rescue services Local government Police Powers Payments Referendums Regional planning and development
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk