Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 November 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Legal Services Act 2007 (Appeals from Licensing Authority Decisions) (No. 2) Order 2011.


Legal Services Act 2007 (Appeals from Licensing Authority Decisions) (No. 2) Order 2011

My Lords, I welcome both orders. The Minister will recollect that when the matter was first discussed here, we raised our concern and he was good enough to say that he would take the matter back, examine it and see what appropriate action was necessary. I endorse what the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, has said. The Minister and his staff have worked very hard to effect those changes, which are certainly welcome. The order sets out an independent appeal mechanism against a range of ABS decisions, which is right; for example, refusing an application for a licence, imposing a conditional licence, disqualifying a person from working in the ABS or imposing a financial penalty. The most interesting part is that appeals on these matters are to go to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. I am told that this helps the SRA to license alternative business structures from the new year onwards. I am also told that the SRA has found significant interest from organisations seeking to become ABSs. It has received over 500 inquiries. Examples of such organisations include private equity investors, claims management companies, the expansion of in-house legal departments, major retailers, accountancy firms and partnerships between non-lawyers and insurers. I particularly welcome the second order as I am involved in promoting a Private Member’s Bill on the rehabilitation of offenders. The noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, hit the nail on the head in regard to this. In the end this is about consumer protection and looking at what information is available. I am delighted to support the measure because it sets out an interesting aspect in simple terms. This is a significant step in that not only will the SRA be able to issue licences, but also the Government have agreed to include non-lawyer owners and, in certain circumstances, the managers of ABSs in the exclusions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. That is right, and we very much appreciate the Minister’s support. Over a period of time this will ensure that all owners of ABSs will have to disclose all their previous convictions and cautions, which ultimately helps the consumer to understand what happens in this legal process. Again, I thank the Minister for the action that he and his staff have taken on this, and we certainly support the orders.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
732 c216GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Criminal records Appeals Legal profession Employment Licensing Rehabilitation Vetting Tribunals Solicitors Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal Alternative business structures
Legislation
Legal Services Act 2007 (Appeals from Licensing Authority Decisions) (No. 2) Order 2011
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) (Amendment) (England and Wales) (No.2) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk