Proceeding contribution from John Hemming (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights.
Judiciary and Fundamental Rights
I aim to be very quick. I found chapter 23 very interesting, as it is the first time that that chapter has been used for the accession of a country. We have perhaps now hit the Groucho Marx threshold for Europe—that we would not be allowed to join the EU because our standards are not high enough to do so. It is somewhat complacent to imply that the standards of our judicial system are always higher than those in Croatia. I spent some time comparing and contrasting the case X v. Croatia and RP and Others v. the United Kingdom. If I have enough time, I will come back to that later. If we look through the document outlining the EU's response, we find the following statement:"““The EU underlines the importance of Croatia improving publication of and access to final court decisions both in the ""interests of the development of case law and consistent judicial practice, and in view of wider public dissemination.””" Well, the UK has a massive problem here. Many judgments are not handed down by the judge—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 536 c253-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Administration of justice Human rights Immigration controls EU enlargement Economic and monetary union Croatia Committee of Permanent Representatives
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:26:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_786960
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_786960
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_786960