---

Trident

Indeed. One of the facts of life is that for anything to do with nuclear weapons, nuclear equipment, AWE, Aldermaston or submarines, the price goes up and up, whatever else happens. The Liberal Democrats have called for a Trident alternative review—that is fine. The Secretary of State announced that the review will take place, fulfilling the coalition agreement by"““assisting the Liberal Democrats to make the case for alternatives.””" However, on 21 November, he said that he had no plans to publish the review. He said:"““In looking at alternative systems and postures, the review draws upon highly classified technical, intelligence and policy information covering extremely sensitive national security issues. There are, therefore, no plans to publish either the report or the information it draws upon.””" Regarding providing information for MPs to scrutinise the Trident replacement programme, the Secretary of State stated that he"““intends to provide an annual update to Parliament; the first of these was produced for the Initial Gate announcement in May of this year. The precise format and timing of subsequent statements is yet to be decided.””—[Official Report, 21 November 2011; Vol. 536, c. 34W.]" Today, the Prime Minister made a written ministerial statement on defence issues, called, ““Strategic Defence and Security Review: First Annual Report””. It states:"““In addition, to assist the Liberal Democrats make the case for alternatives to the Trident system, the Government initiated a study into the costs, feasibility and credibility of alternative nuclear deterrent systems and postures. Progress has also been made on implementing the new nuclear assurances policy and the reduction in our nuclear weapon stockpile to no more than 180 warheads, both commitments set out in the SDSR.””" I find it strange that the Secretary of State would say that we in Parliament are not equipped to know the basis on which an alternative is being looked at. We are not allowed to see the information, because apparently it is all classified. We therefore assume that the alternative is simply never going to see the light of day. Despite the valiant efforts of a number of Liberal Democrat MPs to get that, on the Floor of the House, it will be extremely difficult. The Minister must explain exactly why Parliament is not equipped to know why such vast levels of expenditure are going ahead, and why an alternative is not going to be published.