Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Elected Local Policing Bodies (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2011.


Elected Local Policing Bodies (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2011

I am grateful to the noble Lord and I fully understand the point. Indeed, I remember that when the standards board came in in relation to local government, I thought that some of its earlier judgments were actually inhibiting the democratic process. In no way would I want, if you like, to encourage a bureaucratic process that interferes with the relationship between the elected police and crime commissioner and the electorate. The problem I have is that if the public think the informal resolution process is not very effective, they will be tempted to over-egg the pudding and go for a complaint that will have to be considered by the IPCC. If that happens, I worry that many police and crime commissioners are going to be held back because they could get a plethora of complaints like that. It suggests that there is a need to get the balance right and that we must ensure that the informal process has at least some potential for dealing with these matters effectively in order to prevent a kind of upgrading of complaints.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c343GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Accountability Misconduct Police Standards Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
Legislation
Elected Local Policing Bodies (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2012
Local Policing Bodies (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk