Proceeding contribution from George Osborne (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 December 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Banking Commission Report.
Banking Commission Report
There will be clear definitions in the legislation. To be fair, what John Vickers recommended, and what we are proposing, is relatively straightforward. There are certain things that will have to be in the ring fence, such as the deposits of individuals and the overdrafts of small businesses. There are also certain things that cannot be in it, such as classic investment banking activities. There will then be a middle ground, which will essentially involve corporate lending, and that can either be in the ring fence or not. John Vickers thought that it would be wrong to prescribe that, because different banks have different models, so he has left the location of the ring fence flexible. However, the height of the fence will be high, and we are going to introduce it into legislation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 537 c1090
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Bank services Banks Competition Finance Incentives Standards Regulation Government responses Royal Bank of Scotland Financial Conduct Authority Independent Commission on Banking Payments Council
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:06:39 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_796366
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_796366
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_796366