Proceeding contribution from Baroness Featherstone (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 December 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Firearms Residue Testing (Criminal Cases).
Firearms Residue Testing (Criminal Cases)
My hon. Friend is saying that since the relevant time, new evidence has come to light that casts doubt on all this, and has requested a review. What I can offer is this. I can ask the forensic science regulator, Andrew Rennison, to consider this type of evidence. I cannot give an answer on whether there will be a review, but I will ask his opinion of whether there should be a review. In terms of the Boothby report, my hon. Friend has requested that a report on the allegations of police misconduct in connection with the case made by Mr Cleeland be made available. The Court of Appeal ordered the disclosure of that report in 2001 to seek to allay concerns raised by the appellant at the time about that. We therefore understand that his solicitors from that time may have a copy of the report.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 537 c444WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Criminal proceedings Evidence Firearms Cleeland, Paul
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:23:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_797218
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_797218
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_797218