Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jim Murphy (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 26 January 2012. It occurred during Backbench debate on Strategic Defence and Security Review.


Strategic Defence and Security Review

My hon. Friend the Member for Barrow and Furness (John Woodcock) is over my right shoulder, and I would not wish to steal his speech, because without anticipating its detail I expect it will be a detailed rebuttal of my right hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne East (Mr Brown). Briefly, our view remains that we believe in the minimum credible independent nuclear deterrent. The timing of the Government's process does surprise many, because it seems to be designed for internal political dynamics rather than the defence of our nation, but generally we do support the retention of the minimum independent nuclear deterrent, and we look forward to an informed debate about its renewal.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
539 c479 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Cost effectiveness Defence Deployment National security Strategic Defence and Security Review
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk