Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.

Protection of Freedoms Bill

I am sorry if I in any way misled your Lordships. In her definition of those final five words—particularly the use of ““otherwise””—the noble Baroness is correct. I was seeking to make it clear that impairment through physical or mental disability could be due to old age or otherwise. I am not trying to introduce something new; I am saying that it is possible for the impairment to be not just limited to old age. I hope that I am making myself clear; it does get rather complicated. However, in simple terms, I think that the noble Baroness is right. Amendment 6 agreed. Clause 14 : Destruction of samples Amendment 7 Clause 14 : Destruction of samples Amendment 7 Moved by

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
734 c1520 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Databases CCTV Biometrics Administration of justice Legal profession Fingerprints DNA Evidence Mental illness Personal records Parents Noise Scotland Schools Vulnerable adults Surveillance
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk