Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
22: Clause 26, page 19, leave out lines 29 to 33 and insert— ““(a) at least one parent of the child consents to the information being processed, and (b) no parent of the child has withdrawn his or her consent, or otherwise objected, to the information being processed. (3) Section 27 makes further provision about the requirement to notify parents and the obtaining and withdrawal of consent (including when notification and consent are not required).”” Amendment 22 agreed. Amendments 23 and 24 not moved. Clause 27 : Exceptions and further provision about consent Amendments 25 to 28 Clause 27 : Exceptions and further provision about consent Amendments 25 to 28 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 734 c1542
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Databases CCTV Biometrics Administration of justice Legal profession Fingerprints DNA Evidence Mental illness Personal records Parents Noise Scotland Schools Vulnerable adults Surveillance
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:13:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_805674
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_805674
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_805674