Proceeding contribution from Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for giving way again, but I am now genuinely confused about why this is different. His argument seems to be that a contractual arrangement—we will come back in a moment to the question of who that will cover and whether it will cover primary care—would magically produce a change in culture but that a statutory obligation, applying to all providers registered with the CQC, somehow would not. This is not about requiring the CQC to monitor every interaction with a patient; it is about creating that culture change and a clear sense of obligation—you cannot be registered as a provider with the CQC unless you are committed to doing this.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c593
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Children Contracts Advocacy Health Health services Finance Education Liability Environmental health Higher education Learning disability Private sector NHS Public appointments Management Negligence Standards Training Speech and language therapy Monitor Postgraduate education Speech and language disorders Care Quality Commission NHS Commissioning Board Health Education England Behaviour disorders Clinical commissioning groups
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:38:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809509
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809509
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809509