Proceeding contribution from Lord Turnbull (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 February 2012. It occurred during Question for short debate on Assisted Dying.
Assisted Dying
My Lords, despite the advances made by the DPP’s guidance, the new status quo still leaves the dying and their families with three unsatisfactory choices: to soldier on with their suffering; to accept assistance but still with risk of prosecution; or to pay up and travel to Switzerland to die away from home and family. Parliament should no longer hide behind an official, however enlightened. Any change will face opposition, not just from faith groups and the palliative care sector but also from what might be called the slippery-slopers, who have already concluded that a satisfactory framework can never be found. We should not accept this defeatism; the Bill introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Joffe, was denied a Second Reading, thereby preventing the issues from being explored. With the expertise that we have in this House in medicine, ethics and the law, a robust framework of safeguards must surely be attainable.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c626-7
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crown Prosecution Service Doctors Euthanasia Immunity from prosecution Prosecutions Nurses
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:39:52 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809603
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809603
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809603