Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Turnberg (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 February 2012. It occurred during Question for short debate on Assisted Dying.


Assisted Dying

My Lords, I should express my interest as a past president of the Royal College of Physicians. The question I ask myself is whether the experience of the public prosecutor leads us to believe that we should now change the law. Fewer than 20 cases a year have been referred to the DPP and few of those, if any, have led to prosecution. A new law would, in effect, lower the barrier and remove the critical safeguard provided by an independent body making a fair and objective judgment. The question we have to ask ourselves is not whether it is desirable to make it easier for someone with impeccable motives to help a person suffering unbearably to die. They can do that now in the knowledge that the DPP has been shown to act in an entirely appropriate way. The question really is whether a change in the law will make it easier for someone with selfish, ulterior motives to help an elderly, infirm relative to die. A combination of the current law and the DPP provides a safe and humane system that we would jettison to our disadvantage.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c630 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crown Prosecution Service Doctors Euthanasia Immunity from prosecution Prosecutions Nurses
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk