Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 February 2012. It occurred during Question for short debate on Assisted Dying.


Assisted Dying

My Lords, in the Purdy judgment the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, said that there had been two prosecutions up until then. Since the DPP's new guidelines two years ago, as far as I am aware there have been no prosecutions. Perhaps the Minister could tell us how many cases have actually been referred to the DPP in that time. I believe that the DPP's guidelines, while well-intentioned and a sensible way forward in such a controversial area in many ways, have caused real problems for health professionals—doctors, nurses, et cetera—in discussing end-of-life issues with patients such as their own personal choices about the way they wish to end their life. Do the Government accept that there is a real issue for health professionals, with whom they need to engage in a stronger dialogue? Do they also accept the need to have a parliamentary debate on my noble and learned friend Lord Falconer’s excellent commission’s report, which dispassionately gives us a mountain of evidence that was not there before and that needs to be tackled by Parliament?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c631 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crown Prosecution Service Doctors Euthanasia Immunity from prosecution Prosecutions Nurses
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk