Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 February 2012. It occurred during Question for short debate on Assisted Dying.


Assisted Dying

My Lords, I was a member of the Select Committee that looked at the assisted dying Bill. I co-chair Living and Dying Well and have worked as a hospice doctor since 1987. Assistance with suicide by a treating doctor or healthcare professional tends towards prosecution. The Royal College of Physicians advised the DPP in drawing up his guidance that a doctor’s role is, "““to work with patients to mitigate and overcome their clinical difficulties and suffering””," and that, "““this does not include being, in any way, part of their suicide””." Some claim the policy encourages amateur suicides. It does not. The policy recognises the asymmetric relationship between doctor and patient, with the patient dependent on professional advice and treatment and being very susceptible to nuances in the doctor’s reaction when patients discuss their dying openly. Doctors are in a position of trust; that trust must not be abused. Medical witnesses to Falconer were clear that the present law is not inhibiting open conversations. Indeed, conversations are now more open than ever before, ensuring that healthcare professionals work with their patients to improve living, to cease futile treatments and to support patients during dying. The vast majority of hospice doctors do not want physician-assisted suicide. The policy is clear, firm and compassionate.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c632 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crown Prosecution Service Doctors Euthanasia Immunity from prosecution Prosecutions Nurses
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk