Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 February 2012. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Jobseeker's Allowance (Domestic Violence) (Amendment) Regulations 2012.
Jobseeker's Allowance (Domestic Violence) (Amendment) Regulations 2012
It would be consistent with what the noble Lord has just said if a claim could be made without the claimant having had to have moved out of the accommodation. The claimant might wish to do that and be in the process of trying to move on. I am not sure how this is framed in the primary legislation and maybe that is where the problem lies. The prohibition seems to relate to living at the same address at the point when the claim is made, but that might just be a temporary transitional arrangement as someone seeks to move on for obvious reasons.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c81GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Jobseeker's allowance Eligibility Domestic abuse Social security benefits
- Legislation
- Jobseeker's Allowance (Domestic Violence) (Amendment) Regulations 2012
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:51:17 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_812159
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_812159
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_812159