Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Erroll (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.

Protection of Freedoms Bill

My Lords, I, too, spoke about this danger at an earlier stage of the Bill, and I think the amendment is sensible. Sometimes there are unintended consequences when we make rules, but in this case, because people have seen that there are almost certainly going to be some adverse consequences for UK research establishments, it is sensible to delay implementing this part of the Bill until we have thought about it a little harder and seen some results from other places.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c62-3 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Databases Criminal records Codes of practice Biometrics Crimes of violence Convictions Employment Health services Electronic surveillance Freedom of information DNA Evidence ICT Judiciary Harassment Powers of entry Personal records Protection Powers Negligence Vetting Vulnerable adults Surveillance Research Right of search Stalking Disclosure and Barring Service
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk