Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Laming (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on House of Lords: Peers' Car Park.


House of Lords: Peers' Car Park

My Lords, I am a member of the Administration and Works Committee. I hope very much indeed that the House will reject this Motion. The committee has gone into this matter in greater and greater length. As a member of that committee, as well as the Joint Committee on Security—the noble Lord, Lord Peston, has referred to other committees as well—when it met recently, I was not one of the members who remained silent. I pay tribute to the chairman of the Administration and Works Committee and to Black Rod for the thought that has been given to this issue. In simple terms, if the committee receives a security report which we take seriously, we can do nothing; we could close the Peers' car park and rob the House of important car parking space; or we could take some action to reduce the risk. This is an iconic building that has appeared on the lists of many apprehended terrorists. It would have been irresponsible of the committee not to have taken action. For very good reasons, it wants to keep the car park and therefore some other arrangement had to be made. These plans were shown all around the building. The reasons for them have been adequately explained. The arrangements will be improved. There has already been an indication of the way in which they will be improved over the summer. I agree that we have discussed this at enormous length and I hope that the House will reject this Motion.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c397 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access House of Lords Parking Peers Palace of Westminster Pedestrians Taxis Security Administration and Works Committee
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk