Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on House of Lords: Peers' Car Park.


House of Lords: Peers' Car Park

My Lords, this intervention will be very brief indeed. I speak as a member of the committee and I endorse totally the view, particularly of the right reverend Prelate, that it would not be appropriate for us to describe here the sort of threat that was described to the committee and which led to this decision being taken. It is important that Members of this House should understand, as others have said, that the committee's decision was taken unanimously by the Chief Whips of all the three political parties, who were present, by the Convenor of the Cross Benches, by the right reverend Prelate and by the other Back-Bench Members such as my noble friend Lord Campbell-Savours and myself. I want to refer briefly to one issue that was raised in the committee but which has not been properly referred to today. The committee received representations from staff working in the west front of the building who were concerned about their security. They do not have a voice in this House unless someone here articulates that view for them. However, that point of view is one that we need to take into account as well. I certainly hope that my noble friend will not press his Motion but if he does I shall vote against it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c399 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access House of Lords Parking Peers Palace of Westminster Pedestrians Taxis Security Administration and Works Committee
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk