Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on House of Lords: Peers' Car Park.


House of Lords: Peers' Car Park

My Lords, I am grateful for the short debate that has taken place, and I shall attempt to deal with some of the questions that have been raised. I am very grateful to other members of the Administration and Works Committee: the noble Lord, Lord Laming, the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Exeter and the noble Lords, Lord Campbell-Savours and Lord Faulkner of Worcester, for their support. As they have all said, it was a unanimous decision, taken after a great deal of consideration by the committee, that this was the way forward. I am afraid that I cannot say that I agree with very much of what the noble Lord, Lord Peston, said. First of all, I already addressed in my opening remarks the issue that it was not against the rules to talk about security. There was no rule against it, but it was undesirable to do so—and unwise to do so, as the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, and the noble Lord, Lord Newton of Braintree, have said. I could not follow, I am afraid, the remarks of the noble Lord, Lord Peston, about it being no secret that the cars are now searched at Black Rod's Garden entrance. They are, and anybody can see that. We have no worry with the fact that anybody can see it. The whole point of this is that they were not searched at all before when they came into the car park.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c399 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access House of Lords Parking Peers Palace of Westminster Pedestrians Taxis Security Administration and Works Committee
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk