Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on select committee report on Liaison Committee: Third Report.


Liaison Committee: Third Report

My Lords, I understand that the decision of the European Commission to review the common fisheries policy is due more to the series on television by Mr Fearnley-Whittingstall than to your Lordships' Select Committee. And anyway, we await reform of the common fisheries policy, as we have for the past 30 years. I do not want to turn this into a debate on the pluses and minuses of the European Union, but I want to explain to your Lordships why seven European committees is still far too many. I referred to the series of Questions from the noble Lords, Lord Tebbit and Lord Vinson, the answers to which show that the Select Committee has had virtually no influence on legislation coming to us from Brussels. That is not surprising. Your Lordships may be aware of the process of European legislation, which is proposed in secret by the Commission, negotiated in secret in COREPER and passed in secret in the Council. There is nothing that your Lordships' House or the other place can do when it has gone through that process.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c1178 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
House of Lords Exports Legislation Membership Parliamentary scrutiny Public service Peers Small businesses Select committees European Union Committee Economic Affairs Committee Science and Technology Committee (HL) Select Committee on Communications
Legislation
Adoption and Children Act 2002
Children and Adoption Act 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk