Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Krebs (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on select committee report on Liaison Committee: Third Report.


Liaison Committee: Third Report

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord the Chairman of the Liaison Committee for his summing up, and the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde. A number of telling points have been made during today's debate. I am a little disappointed that in the replies from the noble Lord the Leader of the House and the Chairman of the Liaison Committee those points were not all fully addressed. However, I take heart from the noble Lord the Leader reiterating the point that he made in a letter that he sent to the Cross-Bench Convenor, and perhaps to others, that the reduction that he envisages in the support for the Science and Technology Committee is a small one, which is very different from my understanding when I read the report that essentially support for the committee was going to be halved. I see a glimmer of hope there and I hope that in further discussion I can understand how small ““small”” is. I assume that ““small”” is smaller than what I see as large. On that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment to the Motion withdrawn. Motion agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c1185 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
House of Lords Exports Legislation Membership Parliamentary scrutiny Public service Peers Small businesses Select committees European Union Committee Economic Affairs Committee Science and Technology Committee (HL) Select Committee on Communications
Legislation
Adoption and Children Act 2002
Children and Adoption Act 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk