Proceeding contribution from Lord Grocott (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Trusts (Capital and Income) Bill [HL].
Trusts (Capital and Income) Bill [HL]
I press a question that I should have thought was the most reasonable and fair question that could ever be put to a Leader who is answerable to the whole House and not just for the Government. The debate must surely take place before the Queen's Speech. I cannot understand why the Deputy Leader seems to think it is quite out of order. This House of Lords, faced with a Bill and a report on a Bill that is essentially about the abolition of this institution, is unable even to discuss it before it is finalised. The noble Lord, Lord McNally, has stronger views on this than the Leader. Perhaps he can answer for himself rather than simply parroting Mr Clegg's Bill to the House. I cannot think of any other institution—a university, a factory or a school—where, if it were being closed, the people who work day in, day out in that organisation would be told by the management, ““Sorry folks, you can't discuss it””.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 736 c1417-8
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Joint Committee on the Draft House of Lords Reform Bill
- Legislation
- Trusts (Capital and Income) Bill (HL) 2010-12 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:53:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_822378
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_822378
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_822378