Proceeding contribution from Clive Betts (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 April 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Regeneration.
Regeneration
I shall make some points about that in a minute. The hon. Gentleman anticipates what I am going to say and makes a valid, correct point. Our fundamental criticism of the Government—it will be interesting to hear what the Minister says—is that we did not believe that they had a strategy for dealing with the issue. We did not believe that there was such a strategy in the Government's report on regeneration. We even contrasted that report with the approach to regeneration in Scotland, where the Government seemed to have an overall view of what should happen. It is not just a party political point. I am sure that the Minister will be relieved about that. In the 2005 report, when we had a Government of a different persuasion, the Committee was critical of the Government allowing the pathfinders to go their own way, but not of drawing together themes and trying to enable them to learn lessons from one another. Our criticisms reflect those of a previous report on a previous Government. We do not ever seem to have had an overall, clear national framework.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 543 c148-9WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Housing Infrastructure Planning Regional planning and development Urban areas Regeneration
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:22:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_824346
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_824346
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_824346