Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Grahame Morris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 April 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Outsourcing (Government Departments).


Outsourcing (Government Departments)

I am grateful, Mrs Main, for this opportunity, and it is a privilege to serve under your chairmanship for what I believe is the first time. Today, I hope to raise a very important issue, put down a few markers and seek some answers from the Minister to a series of questions that I will pose. I want to place on record my thanks to the Public and Commercial Services Union, the TUC and Unison for various pieces of briefing information that they have provided in support of my efforts today. When the Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General was Financial Secretary to the Treasury under John Major, he sought to"““extend competition in the provision of public services further and faster than ever before””.—[Official Report, 18 November 1991; Vol. 199, c. 25.]" He said that he would do so with no bias between public and private sector providers. It must surely have been a setback for him personally that, shortly after setting out that agenda, his then constituents in the North Warwickshire constituency decided to ditch him at the 1992 general election in favour of Labour representation. However, in 1997, he returned to Parliament in the far safer Conservative seat of Horsham and he waited patiently for 13 years in opposition before returning in 2010 to his privatisation agenda of 20 years earlier to make private everything that is public. I give this preamble only to set out the context of the debate: we can all understand that an individual who has waited 20 years to achieve his ambition may be more keen to implement his policies and to do so somewhat quicker than otherwise would be the case. Indeed, the right hon. Gentleman has made his intentions clear. In June 2011, he spoke to the business community on the subject of public service reform, saying:"““Spending cuts are one-offs. What we need to do, and are doing, is fundamentally change the way we operate.””" However, the problem with the coalition Government's approach is that it is not evidence-based; it is ideologically driven. Whether they are outsourcing services, opening them up to a range of providers or decentralising them, the Government are gambling with the nation's hard-won assets.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c321WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Contracts Competition Private sector Public sector Civil society
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk