Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Grahame Morris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 April 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Outsourcing (Government Departments).


Outsourcing (Government Departments)

The basis of my argument essentially is that there is no evidence base for that approach. If the hon. Gentleman will allow me to develop my argument a little further, I hope to illustrate that point. If we look at the evidence base, it is in fact a constant lesson from history that reform has often come, as the hon. Gentleman has indicated, in the form of privatisations and outsourcing, but it has not always led to service improvement. Whether the justification for such reformhas been a desire to bring perceived good practice from the private sector into the public sector or, indeed, the belief that savings can be made through outsourcing, the question that we parliamentarians must ask the Government and that I wish to put to the Minister is this: where is the evidence for those reforms? I hope that the Minister will address this issue, which is about the economic and social evidence base rather than an ideological base that is behind what seems to be a rush to sell off services and public assets. It is my contention that the Tory-led policy on public services reform that is being followed by the coalition is ideologically driven and light on any such evidence base. I want to develop that point by presenting some evidence to suggest that the Government are on the wrong side of public opinion and, indeed, wrong about the whole issue of public service reform. I hope that the Minister is aware of a report by Ipsos MORI entitled, ““What do people want, need and expect from public services?”” The report presents the most up-to-date and detailed data on current public attitudes to public services and public service reform. I want to put three headline findings on the record. First, people"““want public services to be based on notions of the public good, rather than just what's good for me””." Secondly, people"““understand the public good largely in terms of universalism, with equality of access to benefits””." Thirdly, people"““struggle to see a compelling or urgent case for reforming public services to cope with economic pressures and social changes””."


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c321-2WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Contracts Competition Private sector Public sector Civil society
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk