Proceeding contribution from Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Sunday Trading (London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games) Bill [Lords].
Sunday Trading (London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games) Bill [Lords]
I am grateful to the Minister for that assurance. Several Opposition colleagues have mentioned the Bill's timing. A private Member's Bill to the effect of this Bill was brought to the House just before Christmas, and the question has been put, ““Why not take forward that Bill, rather than the Government imposing their own?”” I imagine the answer is that proper reflection on its implications and consultation with all parties would need to take place, and it has. Will the Minister confirm that proper consideration, not any devious motive that Opposition Members might invent, was the reason for this Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 543 c1319-20
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Leisure Greater London Opening hours Religion Small businesses Working hours Shops Retail trade Supermarkets Sunday trading Olympic Games 2012 Paralympic Games 2012 Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Sunday Trading (London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games) Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:09:58 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_827083
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_827083
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_827083