Adjournment debate on Tuesday, 31 October 2006, in the House of Commons, led by Paul Burstow. The answering member was Jim Fitzpatrick.

Postal Recognition of Cheam

Adjournment debate on the recognition of Cheam by the Post Office.

Secondary information

Type: Parliamentary proceeding
Reference: 451 c270-8
Session: 2005-06
Department: Department of Trade and Industry
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Proceeding contributions: Jim Fitzpatrick | 451 c273-4 (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the hon. Member for Sutton and Cheam (Mr. Burstow) on securing the debate and on his ...; Jim Fitzpatrick | 451 c275-8 (Link to this contribution) I hear what the hon. Gentleman says. I am happy to give way to him because this is his Adjournment d...; Paul Burstow | 451 c274 (Link to this contribution) The Minister is setting out clearly the benefits of the postcode. In doing so, however, perhaps he w...; Jim Fitzpatrick | 451 c274-5 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman has a point—there does seem to be a minor anomaly. Wallington is a postal town be...; Paul Burstow | 451 c275 (Link to this contribution) I point out to the Minister that we cannot begin the fast-track process because the Post Office will...; Paul Burstow | 451 c270-3 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the opportunity this evening to bring to the attention of the House an issue that ...
Subjects: Post Office Postcodes Cheam
Link: View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk