Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Tuesday, 6 February 2007, in the House of Lords.

Legal Services Bill [HL]

Legal Services Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage fourth day. Clauses 110 and 111 agreed to. Part 2 of 2 records.

Secondary information

Type: Parliamentary proceeding
Reference: 689 c682-700
Session: 2006-07
Department: Department for Constitutional Affairs
Legislative stage: Committee stage
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Related items: Legal Services Bill (HL). In two volumes. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 9-EN also published.
Thursday, 23 November 2006
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions: Lord Kingsland | 689 c697-8 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 110A: 110A: After Clause 111, insert the following new Clause— ““Regulatory ob...; Lord Kingsland | 689 c696 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 110: 110: Clause 110, page 60, line 9, at end insert— ““( ) Nothing in this Pa...; Lord Kingsland | 689 c695-6 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness made the point about the OLC being the initial recipient of a complaint; but I wo...; Lord Kingsland | 689 c697 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for her reply. I shall look at all the provisions to which ...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c696-7 (Link to this contribution) I agree with the noble Lord that a complainant should not be prevented from making a claim on the La...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c693-4 (Link to this contribution) That is not how I see it from my perspective, if I may say so to the noble and learned Baroness. It ...; Baroness Butler-Sloss | 689 c693 (Link to this contribution) What is the difference in principle between buying in the expertise and delegating it? Why is it nec...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c695 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord is correct; we are not making a distinction, because the Bill makes no distinction be...; Lord Kingsland | 689 c694-5 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Baroness for her reply, and I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. I was pleased...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c692-3 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure that I can give the noble Lord that specific information now but, of course, I shall d...; Lord Carlile of Berriew | 689 c692 (Link to this contribution) Can the noble Baroness tell the Committee whether the Government have made any cost comparison betwe...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c692 (Link to this contribution) I am very happy to give the noble Lord more detail on the cost-benefit analysis and I shall do so. H...; Lord Thomas of Gresford | 689 c686 (Link to this contribution) All I said was, ““Alex won””.; Lord Carlile of Berriew | 689 c686-7 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to my noble friend for telling everyone that; it is true. The point of this story, whi...; Baroness Butler-Sloss | 689 c684-5 (Link to this contribution) I support the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland. He rather stole the words that I might have used, which I ...; Lord Carlile of Berriew | 689 c685-6 (Link to this contribution) I too support the amendments, other than those tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, which as I see...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c690-2 (Link to this contribution) This has been an interesting debate, eloquently put forward by noble Lords who have a great deal of ...; Lord Thomas of Gresford | 689 c692 (Link to this contribution) Did the cost-benefit analysis take into account redundancy at the current office? After all, it is n...; Lord Thomas of Gresford | 689 c687-9 (Link to this contribution) I, too, have appeared on behalf of a barrister before the Bar Council’s disciplinary proceedings. He...; Lord Borrie | 689 c689-90 (Link to this contribution) I, too, support the paving amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, and particularly his Amendme...; Lord Kingsland | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) Never let it be said that the Committee proceedings on this Bill have been engineered by a conspirac...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) When the noble Lord is thinking about this matter before Report, will he consider the possibility th...; Lord Kingsland | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) I accept that that could well be the way forward. Before the proceedings finish in this Chamber, I w...; Lord Grocott | 689 c700 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move that the House do now resume. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.; Lord Neill of Bladen | 689 c698 (Link to this contribution) I disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland. He seems to base his proposition on the unstated ass...; Lord Borrie | 689 c698-9 (Link to this contribution) Briefly, I support what the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen, has said. The impression given by the ...; Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 689 c699-700 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for all the contributions. The noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, reasonably refers us back t...; Lord Kingsland | 689 c682-4 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 109: 109: Clause 110, page 60, line 1, at beginning insert ““Subject to certai...
Subjects: Complaints Disciplinary proceedings Compensation Legal profession Misconduct Ombudsman Regulation Solicitors General Council of the Bar Legal Services Board Office for Legal Complaints
Legislation: Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link: View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk

Legal Services Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools