Written statement made by Liam Byrne (Labour) on Thursday, 20 November 2008 in the House of Commons, on behalf of the Cabinet Office.
Omand Review
On 11 June my predecessor told the House, Official Report, column 485 of two lost Joint Intelligence Committee assessments and announced that the Cabinet Secretary had asked Sir David Omand to carry out a full investigation of the circumstances of the case. He undertook to keep the House informed of Sir David's conclusions. Sir David Omand's review was carried out in the summer. His report could not be finalised pending the outcome of the internal disciplinary process and the police investigations. With the conviction of the individual responsible under s.8(1) of the Official Secrets Act on 28 October, those processes are now complete. I am grateful to Sir David for the care he has taken in carrying out the review. Sir David was also asked to look at the procedures in place for the handling and protection of intelligence material, and for staff training, induction and security awareness. Sir David concluded that the documents were mislaid because of the direct actions of the officer and that even if all the current security procedures had been followed to the letter the inadvertent removal of the documents, though less likely to have occurred, could still have happened. He judged that the loss was not a preventable accident given the mistakes made by the individual. He has also observed that no security system that is both affordable and allows for the efficient conduct of business will provide proof against all forms of human error; and that the key determinant of good security has always been and remains staff with high morale and sense of purpose. Sir David said he had no reservations in that regard about the staff of the Joint Intelligence Organisation, who are highly security aware. Sir David has recommended a number of additional and affordable measures covering security education, practical procedures and emergency arrangements that would reduce some of the more likely human failings. He has also made suggestions about strengthening governance of the future development of security policy. An example of the sort of measures recommended that can be made public without damaging security is the introduction of spot checks. All the recommendations have been accepted: many have already been implemented but some depend on changes to accommodation in hand and will be implemented when those changes have been made. The Intelligence and Security Committee have been fully briefed on Sir David's investigation and recommendations and the action that the Government are taking. As my predecessor said in his statement on 11 June:"ββIt is a matter of utmost concern to the Government that this breach of security has happened. We will take all steps to ensure that all individuals who work within the Joint Intelligence Committee staff observe the procedures that are necessary for security. We will continue to do everything necessary to safeguard sensitive intelligence material so that we safeguard the British national interest.ββ"
Secondary information
- Type
- Written statement
- Reference
- 483 c35-6WS
- Session
- 2007-08
- Related items
-
Cabinet Office Assessment (Documents)
Thursday, 12 June 2008
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Commons
- Subjects
- Data protection Intelligence services Official secrets Security Cabinet Office Joint Intelligence Committee
- Link
- View this Written statement on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 20:38:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_73837
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_73837
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_73837