Parliamentary Search

Debate on bill on Friday, 12 March 2010, in the House of Commons, led by Christopher Chope. The answering member was Barbara Follett.

Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill

Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill. Report stage. Amendments debated and withdrawn or negatived. Motion for third reading objected to. Bill to be read a third time tomorrow.

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
507 c567-79 
Session
2009-10
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Legislative stage
Report stage
Procedure
Private members' bills proceedings
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Related items
Proceeding contributions
Nick Raynsford | 507 c579 (Link to this contribution) I hope the House will not accept the amendment. Amendment 25 negatived.
Barbara Follett | 507 c576 (Link to this contribution) I will be as brief as possible. First, the Government wholeheartedly support amendment 1, tabled by ...
Show all contributions (20)
Nick Raynsford | 507 c575-6 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman raised that issue in an intervention on the hon. Member for Christchurch. I am ha...
Simon Burns | 507 c575 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps the right hon. Gentleman will be able to answer my question; I genuinely do not know the ans...
Nick Raynsford | 507 c572-5 (Link to this contribution) I should say at the outset that I am taking the Bill through its remaining Commons stages on behalf ...
Speaker | 507 c578 (Link to this contribution) With this we may consider amendment 2, page 5, leave out lines 26 to 30 and insert—
Christopher Chope | 507 c578 (Link to this contribution) Amendment 2 was tabled by the right hon. Member for Greenwich and Woolwich (Mr. Raynsford). Although...
Christopher Chope | 507 c576-7 (Link to this contribution) It is a pleasure to wind up the debate. I thank the right hon. Member for Greenwich and Woolwich (Mr...
Nick Raynsford | 507 c578 (Link to this contribution) It might help the hon. Gentleman if I tell him that that is exactly the effect that amendment 2 woul...
Christopher Chope | 507 c579 (Link to this contribution) As always, the right hon. Gentleman is very persuasive, and I can see the advantages of amendment 2 ...
Speaker | 507 c567-8 (Link to this contribution) With this it will be convenient to discuss the following.
Christopher Chope | 507 c567 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move amendment 8, page 1, line 12, leave out 'section' and insert 'significant section'.
Christopher Chope | 507 c568-70 (Link to this contribution) I am speaking to these amendments on behalf of my hon. Friend the Member for Putney (Justine Greenin...
Simon Burns | 507 c570 (Link to this contribution) Does my hon. Friend agree that it is desirable and important that we have the affirmative, rather th...
Christopher Chope | 507 c570-1 (Link to this contribution) As so often, my hon. Friend makes a very important point. We are talking here about interfering with...
Simon Burns | 507 c571 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I should intervene on the Minister later for an answer to this question. In the interpretati...
Christopher Chope | 507 c571 (Link to this contribution) It is true that there is no reference to borough councils, except London borough councils. Colloquia...
Simon Burns | 507 c571 (Link to this contribution) My hon. Friend is right, as usual. The reason I asked is that in the area that I represent, the coun...
Christopher Chope | 507 c571-2 (Link to this contribution) Indeed. The more important issue that the Minister needs to address is why a local authority is defi...
Christopher Chope | 507 c578 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move amendment 25, page 5, line 18, leave out Clause 8.
Subjects
Accountability Councillors Local government Public bodies
Legislation
Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk